Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kristjan Tamm vs William Jansen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tamm vs Jansen analysis and find out who is favored!
Kristjan Tamm vs William Jansen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tamm 1 - 0 Jansen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamm has won 45.32% of points on their second serve, while Jansen has won 52.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamm, in recent form, has won 46.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jansen has won 53.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.21% and 36.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tamm has saved 63.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jansen has saved 60.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tamm has won 40% of matches played (W/L 10/ 15), with Jansen winning 60% (W/L 15/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 95/ 74), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19). Jansen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Tamm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14), where as Jansen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tamm winning 1 times and Jansen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tamm winning 2 and Jansen winning 0. The last match between Tamm and Jansen was at the M15 Al Zahra, 05-11-2022, Semifinals, Hard with Kristjan Tamm getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tamm and Jansen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tamm winning 0 times and Jansen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tamm winning 0, and Jansen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamm has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.48 while Jansen has played against players with an average rank of 111.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamm has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jansen has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamm has converted 38.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jansen has converted 40.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
827
Rank
625
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
51% (165-160)
Career Total W/L
53% (26-23)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
75% (9-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kristjan Tamm vs William Jansen For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tamm VS Jansen
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Kristjan Tamm | William Jansen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (32/47) | 75% (42/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (27/32) | 64% (27/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (9/15) | 43% (6/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (23/56) | 23% (11/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Kristjan Tamm
Player
William Jansen
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kristjan Tamm | William Jansen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 75% (9/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (23/31) | 67% (18/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (252/267) | 60% (148/98) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (9/12) | 82% (9/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 123 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.07 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:11 | 1:16:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.87 | 71.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (997/1606) | 74% (392/532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (704/997) | 70% (275/392) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (276/609) | 54% (75/140) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (47/122) | 40% (25/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (540/1521) | 42% (248/595) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 41% (9/13) | 82% (9/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 75% (9/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 50% (6/3) |
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Kristjan Tamm
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Kristjan Tamm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
15
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
17 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 7-6(1) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Kristjan Tamm
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Kristjan Tamm
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
William Jansen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
William Jansen
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
5
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Yuichiro Inui
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Xirui Han
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-0 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
William Jansen
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
William Jansen
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
79%
(
46 of
58)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Pedro Araujo
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Rushil Khosla
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamm Vs Jansen Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tamm are available here and Jansen photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
